Conference Policies

Peer Review Process

Papers are reviewed by two blind readers. Final acceptance decisions are made by the conference directors. In the case of a discrepancy between readers a third review may be solicited. Reviewers consist of other scholars in the field, especially past contributors to CaTaC conferences. Reviews are generally completed within 3 to 4 weeks.

 

Archive Access Policy

The presentations that make up the current and archived conferences on this site have been made open access and are freely available for viewing, for the benefit of authors and interested readers.

 

Registration

Please go to http://www.uwl.ac.uk/academic-schools/computing/events/catac-2016 for information about registering for CaTaC 2016.